<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Back of the Ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/</link>
	<description>Champaign County Clerk Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Mark, could you have an oval on the back of the ballot that says "I voted" (entered into the machine as a fake race) and program the machine to reject undervotes in that race?  That would at require voters to acknowledge that they'd seen the back of the ballot without making them vote in a real race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, could you have an oval on the back of the ballot that says &#8220;I voted&#8221; (entered into the machine as a fake race) and program the machine to reject undervotes in that race?  That would at require voters to acknowledge that they&#8217;d seen the back of the ballot without making them vote in a real race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macon county clerk steve bean</title>
		<link>http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>macon county clerk steve bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>As another County Clerk who has used optical scan ballots since the primary of 2004. The problems being discuss here are the same problems that Macon County and other counties have faced. We had the same problem with voters not going through all the ballot pages.&lt;br/&gt;The only solution is that a touchscreen DRE voting device makes you go through the complete ballot. Election judges faced a difficult day with the weather and a lot of new equipment and laws to deal with. &lt;br/&gt;Here's hoping that we all learn from the primary and have a great general election</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As another County Clerk who has used optical scan ballots since the primary of 2004. The problems being discuss here are the same problems that Macon County and other counties have faced. We had the same problem with voters not going through all the ballot pages.<br />The only solution is that a touchscreen DRE voting device makes you go through the complete ballot. Election judges faced a difficult day with the weather and a lot of new equipment and laws to deal with. <br />Here&#8217;s hoping that we all learn from the primary and have a great general election</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>In my precinct judges did not say anything early on about the flip side but did so later in the day.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I suspect that in a busier election season it wouldn't have been an issue because the front and back would have been more filled, but still, *clear* instructions at the bottom of the first page to flip over would be very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my precinct judges did not say anything early on about the flip side but did so later in the day.</p>
<p>I suspect that in a busier election season it wouldn&#8217;t have been an issue because the front and back would have been more filled, but still, *clear* instructions at the bottom of the first page to flip over would be very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.champaigncountyclerk.com/2006/03/30/the-back-of-the-ballot/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>In my precinct the judges did not say anything about looking on the back.  I thought I was finished voting and was about to leave the booth when I realized I had not voted on the school bond referendum and turned the ballot over.  When I came out I mentioned to the judges that I almost didn't see the back and they should be sure to mention to people to look on the back when they handed out the ballots.  They seemed very defensive and said it was printed right on the front -- which it was, but not prominently.  I think more emphasis to the judges to tell people, and putting the caution in more noticeable font should solve the problem.  Also, as people get used to these ballots they will know to look on the back automatically.  I know I won't have the problem in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my precinct the judges did not say anything about looking on the back.  I thought I was finished voting and was about to leave the booth when I realized I had not voted on the school bond referendum and turned the ballot over.  When I came out I mentioned to the judges that I almost didn&#8217;t see the back and they should be sure to mention to people to look on the back when they handed out the ballots.  They seemed very defensive and said it was printed right on the front &#8212; which it was, but not prominently.  I think more emphasis to the judges to tell people, and putting the caution in more noticeable font should solve the problem.  Also, as people get used to these ballots they will know to look on the back automatically.  I know I won&#8217;t have the problem in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.387 seconds -->
